|Rome history||Sleeping||Contact Us|
A look at the discussions of Religious causes and Political causes for the fall of the Roman empire lead me to suggest two areas of interest when considering the Roman economy as an angle of approach to the reasons for the fall of the Roman empire.....
This last thought takes us back to the considerations about religion and changing social attitudes: Many Latin authors denounce the change in society, the change in habits and the hunger for wealth as an underlying issue. This issue can also be viewed in economic terms: The love of wealth and the increasingly large population in Rome, in the west, was causing a severe imbalance of trade, coupled with inflation (as shown by the continued impoverishment of their coinage). These two effects are not of course disconnected, since much of the trade imbalance was also due to the need to feed the masses and general social costs which could only be funded either through (successful) war or through taxation and indirectly through inflation.
Rome’s wealth was sustained by its position as a service and trade centre. It was not a major centre of production of value-added goods. Ammianus Marcellinus tells us that in his time at approx 390AD, ie end of the 4th century, the upper class were still consuming all sorts of highly refined foods and products. We can imagine what the impact must have been when these consumers reduced in number through war and plague or indeed reduced in wealth when Rome was sacked. In fact it is quite likely that with the sudden removal of gold (ie not all wealth but the basic standard of wealth) there may well have been a direct impact on lending and liquidity and hence on investment. Deflation would have been quite a probable scenario of the time with the subsequent emigration of trade to more immediately profitable ventures at cities such as Alexandria or Constantinople.
A degree of economy remained of course, through reconstruction efforts, particularly of churches and other cult related sites, nevertheless, taxation exhausted the local economy and helped divert trade to other parts of the Mediterranean: an insight of this is given in 554 with Emperor Justinian’s "Pragmatic Sanction" which made Italy a province of the Byzantine empire (ie Roman empire of the East) and laid out taxation which was promptly suspended for three years due to the citizens’ relative indigence after the drawn out Gothic wars.
These aspects of the fall of the Roman empire will be given some further consideration in the following sections:
link to: society after the fall of the roman empire
|Back to the top | email us | about MariamMilani | Index of all Rome history pages | Apartments in Rome |
Roman History: | aeneas | Romulus, Remus & the origins of Rome | The ancient roman kings | Oath of the Horatii | The Kingdom and Seven Kings of Rome | The Roman Republic | The Conquest of Italy and the Punic Wars | The Republic in crisis | Julius Caesar and the end of the Republic | Queen Cleopatra of Egypt | Augustus and the Empire | The 12 Caesars | The Five Good Emperors | Other Emperors | Emperor Constantine and Christianisation | fall of the roman empire |
| roman empire | pax romana | Reasons for the collapse and fall of the roman empire | Contributions by Ancient Romans |
Please email us if you feel a correction is required to the Rome information provided. Please read the disclaimer
"Fall of the Roman Empire" was written by Giovanni Milani-Santarpia for www.mariamilani.com - Rome apartments